The Garments of the Holy Priesthood
By Bill McKeever
Following
the washing and anointing ceremonies in the LDS temple ceremony, the patron is
then assisted in putting on the "Garment of the Holy Priesthood."
Originally this garment closely resembled a pair of long underwear and was only
available in a one-piece style. Today, however; some temple Mormons choose to
wear a modified two-piece version. Unique to this garment are markings sewn
into them which are similar to those used in Freemasonry. Over the right breast
is a buttonhole which resembles a "square" (looks like a backward L);
over the left breast is a "compass" (resembling a capital V). Sewn
into the abdomen and knee area is another marking which looks like an ordinary
button-hole.
During
their pre-endowment instructions, participants are told that if they are true
and faithful to the covenants they will make in the ceremony, their
"Garment of the Holy Priesthood "will be a shield, and a protection
to you against the power of the destroyer until you have finished your work
here on earth." Temple Mormons are also told that this garment must be
worn throughout their lives and represents the garment given to Adam in the
Garden of Eden.
Stories
of the sacred garment offering protection have long been a part of Mormon
folklore. If true, it would seem that wearing their garments would be the
soldier's best friend against harm during war. Yet, the LDS Church provides no
proof that garment-wearing soldiers all escaped death or injury during war-time
conflict. Are we to believe that garment-wearing Mormons are never injured or
killed in traffic accidents? Of course the Mormon can always claim that an
injury "could have been worse" or that death was allowed because
"there work on earth was done." Such answers, however, provide no
environment to actually prove if the garments played any role whatsoever.
When
he appeared in an April 1996 episode of "60 Minutes," San Francisco
49er quarterback Steve Young told interviewer Mike Wallace that he chose not to
wear his garments when on the playing field. Some might think that in playing
such a dangerous position Mr. Young would best be served by putting them on
(especially in light of his injury-plagued 1996 season). Bill Marriott, on the
other hand, told Mike Wallace that the garments do in fact offer protection.
The owner of the Marriott hotel chain then related a fantastic story how, when
he was in a fiery boating accident, his garments protected him from being
burned.
While
the Bible tells the believer to have his "loins girt about with
truth" and to put on the "breastplate of righteousness," such
metaphorical language never implies Christians are to place their trust in
actual physical objects. The idea of protective undergarments falls into the
same category as the proverbial rabbit's foot or talisman. It is of pagan
origin and has no biblical justification.